Big Bang theory has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong

Because the ‘expanding Universe’ has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong
------------------------------------------------ by Bingcheng Zhao

Related knowledge: the central idea of the Big Bang theory (BBT) is the combination of Hubble’s law and general relativity. Hubble’s law is regarded as the decisive observational evidence for the BBT, and general relativity is believed as the theoretical basis of the BBT. Stated briefly, the BBT is literally the extrapolation of the ‘expanding Universe’.

Core reminding!!! Fact 1: the ‘expanding Universe’ has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 761 ~ 766, 7.2, Ch.7A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz79.blogspot.com/ ). Fact 2: Hubble’s law has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong (P. 735 ~ 751, Ch.6B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz78.blogspot.com/ ). Fact 3: general relativity has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 399 ~ 444, Ch.4A, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz74.blogspot.com/ ). These three facts will be tangibly helpful to digesting and accepting another proven fact: the Big Bang theory has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong ---- the central topic of 7.3.1, Ch.7A (P. 766 ~ 772, 7.3.1, Ch.7A, reference #2). <***> Related emphasis: in order to convince that the Big Bang theory has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong, besides providing sufficient evidences (e.g., after proving the ‘expanding Universe’ is mechanistically thus essentially wrong, Hubble’s law is mechanistically and mathematically wrong, and general relativity is mechanistically thus essentially wrong), you have to be able to explain why cosmic microwave radiation is not valid evidence for the Big Bang theory ---- Yes, I do (P. 767 ~ 769, 7.3.1 c), Ch.7A, reference #2).

[*Two acronyms: (1) BBT = Big Bang theory. (2) EPBGR = Einstein’s postulate-based general relativity (i.e., general relativity) ---- note, Einstein’s general relativity is based on a series of assumptions and postulates (e.g., the postulate of equivalence principle), so its real name should be Einstein’s postulate-based general relativity].


Proving the Big Bang theory (BBT) is mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 766 ~ 772, 7.3.1, Ch.7A, reference #2). Briefly, after the concept of ‘expanding Universe’ has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 761 ~ 766, 7.2, Ch.7A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz79.blogspot.com/ ), the BBT is mechanistically thus essentially wrong consequently, because the BBT is literally the product of extrapolating ‘expanding Universe’. Stated from another perspective, the central idea of the BBT is the combination of Hubble’s law and EPBGR ---- Hubble’s law is the crucial observational evidence, and EPBGR is the theoretical basis. However, Hubble’s law has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong (P. 735 ~ 751, Ch.6B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz78.blogspot.com/ ); EPBGR has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 399 ~ 444, Ch.4A, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz74.blogspot.com/ ). Consequently the BBT is mechanistically thus essentially wrong, i.e., mechanistically thus essentially the so-called Big Bang did not and could not occur at all. Be clarified, with the disappearance of the previously believed Big Bang, any other previously claimed measured evidences for the BBT (e.g., the cosmic microwave radiation) turn out to be invalid accordingly, because they cannot be independently valid evidences at all; be further clarified, the cosmic microwave radiation can never be the independent evidence for the BBT ---- its validity is totally dependent on the validity of Hubble’s law (P. 767 ~ 769, 7.3.1 c), Ch.7A, reference #2). Be emphasized, because the postulate-based BBT utterly skips over the mechanism thus essence behind its describing phenomena, any so-called observational or experimental verification of the BBT cannot be mechanistically thus essentially valid. In addition, five important available clues indicating that the BBT cannot be mechanistically thus essentially correct have been provided and analyzed (P. 769 ~ 770, 7.3.1 d), Ch.7A, reference #2).


The key to understanding of the undeniable (proven) fact that cosmic microwave radiation is not valid evidence for the Big Bang theory (BBT): cosmic microwave radiation (CMR) is not valid evidence for the BBT, for at least the following five reasons (P. 767 ~ 769, 7.3.1 c), Ch.7A, reference #2). (1) First of all and most of all, the prerequisite for the validity of CMR is the validity of the believed Big Bang. Now with the invalidity of the believed Big Bang as the consequence that the BBT has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong, the validity of CMR mechanistically thus essentially evaporates accordingly. (2) Fundamentally, CMR can never be the independent evidence for the BBT ---- its validity is totally dependent on the validity of Hubble’s law. As the consequence that Hubble’s law cannot be the valid observational evidence for the BBT, CMR turns out to be mechanistically thus essentially invalid. (3) Logically, in order to draw the solid and sound conclusion that CMR is the valid evidence of the BBT, another prerequisite is to ensure that the claimed Big Bang is the only source of CMR and no any other astronomical objects can generate and emit CMR. However, the prerequisite is utterly untenable at present, particularly under the condition that modern physics is utterly unable to solve the following crucially related important problems, including: the mysterious source of gamma ray bursts, the mysterious source of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays, the famous GZK paradox, …etc. Therefore, before solving the problems of the mysterious source of gamma ray bursts, the mysterious source of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays, and the famous GZK paradox, it is definitely impossible to ensure that the claimed Big Bang is the only source of the CMR, let alone that the so-called Big Bang did not and could not occur at all. Three pieces of related information: The problem of gamma ray bursts has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 567 ~ 574, 5.8, Ch.5C, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz31.blogspot.com/ ); The problem of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 574 ~ 577, 5.9, Ch.5C, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz32.blogspot.com/ ); The famous GZK paradox has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 578 ~ 580, 5.10, Ch.5C, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz33.blogspot.com/ ). (4) Realistically, the CMR measured by Penzias and Wilson can be readily even easily emitted from the black holes that are defined and described based on the newly established Mechanism-Revealed Black Hole Theory (MRBHT) (P. 541 ~ 553, 5.5 & 5.6, Ch.5B, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz28.blogspot.com/ , http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz29.blogspot.com/ ), including the extremely supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way galaxy ---- MRBHT is the fundamental key to solve a series of modern physics permanently incapable solved fundamentally important problems, including: the mystery of dark matter, the mystery of gamma ray bursts, the mysterious source of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays, the famous GZK paradox, …etc. (5) Since CMR can be readily even easily emitted from different black holes defined and described based on MRBHT, it is natural or normal that the measured CMR indicates a tiny temperature variations. In other words, the slight temperature variations in themselves tend to be more affirmative of the newly established MRBHT.

The key to understanding of the proven fact that the Big Bang theory (BBT) is mechanistically thus essentially wrong: (1) knowing of the proven fact that Hubble’s law has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong (P. 735 ~ 751, Ch.6B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz78.blogspot.com/ ), simply because Hubble’s law is the crucial observational evidence for the BBT. (2) Knowing of the proven fact that general relativity has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 399 ~ 444, Ch.4A, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz74.blogspot.com/ ), simply because general relativity is the theoretical basis responsible for interpreting of the BBT. (3) Knowing of the well-known and undeniable fact: modern physics does not and cannot solve the fundamentally important problem of why time and space are variable thus relative in gravitational field, because the so-called BBT is ultimately the product of modern physics unable to know why time and space are variable thus relative in gravitational field. (4) The newly revealed mechanism behind universal gravitational constant G, which is that the value of G is and represents the reduction in the scales of space and time occurring in gravitational field (P. 505 ~ 509, 4.16, Ch.4B, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz26.blogspot.com/ ), will be concretely helpful to understanding of the proven fact that the BBT is mechanistically thus essentially wrong, because a theoretical root of the BBT is EPBGR’s postulate of ‘invariant scales of length (space) and time’.

The mechanistically thus essentially profound implications of the Big Bang theory (BBT) turns out to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong: (1) any so-called observational verifications or tests of the BBT cannot be mechanistically thus essentially valid, because the BBT has been proven utterly skipping over the mechanism thus essence behind its describing phenomena via its based Hubble’s law and EPBGR. (2) Any so-called interpretations of the BBT cannot be mechanistically thus essentially correct, because this sort of interpretations turns out to be merely the consequence of mechanistically thus essentially mistakenly interpreting observational or experimental results with Hubble’s law and EPBGR.

The catastrophic consequences of not accepting the proven fact that the Big Bang theory (BBT) is mechanistically thus essentially wrong: (1) modern astronomy, cosmology and astrophysics will continue to be built upon the mechanistically and mathematically wrong foundation and paradigm of the BBT. (2) It is impossible to establish mechanistically thus essentially correct concept of time and space in the universe.


14 pieces of related information: (1) Hubble’s law has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong (P. 735 ~ 751, Ch.6B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz78.blogspot.com/ ). (2) General relativity has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 399 ~ 444, Ch.4A, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz74.blogspot.com/ ). (3) The ‘expanding Universe’ has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 761 ~ 766, 7.2, Ch.7A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz79.blogspot.com/ ). (4) Establishing and Verifying Mechanism-Revealed Gravitational Theory (P. 445 ~ 514, Ch.4B, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz20.blogspot.com/ ). (5) Revealing the mechanism behind universal gravitational constant G (P. 505 ~ 509, 4.16, Ch.4B, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz26.blogspot.com/ ). (6) Discovering the principle of Mechanism-Revealed Redshift and Blueshift of Light (P. 714 ~ 722, 6.5 and 6.6, Ch.6A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz34.blogspot.com/ ). (7) Doppler effect for light has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong (P. 722 ~ 732, 6.7, Ch.6A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz77.blogspot.com/ ). (8) The newly established Mechanism-Revealed Black Hole Theory (P. 541 ~ 553, 5.5 & 5.6, Ch.5B, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz28.blogspot.com/ , http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz29.blogspot.com/ ). (9) The problem of gamma ray bursts has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 567 ~ 574, 5.8, Ch.5C, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz31.blogspot.com/ ). (10) The problem of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 574 ~ 577, 5.9, Ch.5C, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz32.blogspot.com/ ). (11) The famous GZK paradox has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 578 ~ 580, 5.10, Ch.5C, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz33.blogspot.com/ ). (12) The problem of dark matter has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 560 ~ 567, 5.7, Ch.5C, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz30.blogspot.com/ ). (13) The law of object’s mass doing work (P. 93 ~ 109, Ch.1A, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz1.blogspot.com/ ). (14) Mechanism-Revealed Physics, Bingcheng Zhao (http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz71.blogspot.com/ ).


Reference #1: 2009, Bingcheng Zhao, From Postulate-Based Modern Physics to Mechanism-Revealed Physics [Vol. 1(1/2)], ISBN: 978-1-4357-4913-9.
Reference #2: 2009, Bingcheng Zhao, From Postulate-Based Modern Physics to Mechanism-Revealed Physics [Vol. 2(2/2)], ISBN: 978-1-4357-5033-3.

Ph.D., Bingcheng Zhao,
The author of “From Postulate-Based Modern Physics to Mechanism-Revealed Physics”
1401 NE Merman Dr. Apt. 703, Pullman, WA 99163 USA.
Email: bingcheng.zhao@gmail.com